- A Scrutiny of the Abstract, I -- Kenneth K. Landes, AAPG Bulletin, 35, 1660-1680, 1951.
- A Scrutiny of the Abstract, II -- Kenneth K. Landes, AAPG Bulletin, 50, 1992-1999, 1966.
- The Abstract Rescrutinized -- P. D. Lowman, Geology, 16, 1063, 1998.
- Some considerations when abstracting -- Kenneth D. Mahrer, Geophysics, 58, 10-11, 1993.
From this article:
An abstract should summarize the content of the article not the intent of the writer(s).
It should contain only that which you are specifically reporting in the manuscript.
Based on Day's (1983) recommendations, the abstract should have at most one or
two sentences on each of the four foundation points of your work.
These are:
- principal objectives and scope of the work,
- methodology,
- results,
- conclusions.
- An example of a good abstract from a scientific meeting:
- Ulrich, C. A., and L. D. Slater, Hysteresis in
the low frequency electrical response of unsaturated unconsolidated sediments,
American Geophysical Union, Annual Fall Meeting, Dec. 6-10, 2002,
San Francisco, CA, Abstract # T22B-1159, 2002.